The topic of sex and tattoos baffled me because I didn't see a correlation. At all. I mean when you get a tatt, the needle goes in and out, in and out....and, when you have sex, well....yeah.
The more I thought the more one phrase stuck with me. I started thinking about what my daughter refers to as a "tramp stamp":
A tramp stamp is essentially a tattoo that rests on the sacrum of a woman's spine. Like so...
If you can't read the caption, it says "How did we ever tell the good girls from the skanks before this?"
I searched and searched the Google images for a similar sentiment about men with tattoos.
But to no avail. I found a bunch of sexy tatt pictures featuring men, as the picture above attests. It used to be that only male convicts, sailors and bikers had tattoos. Interestingly, there is no stigma from those stereotypes haunting tattooed men today. No, if you have a tattoo as a man, you are tough, cool, or if the tattoo means something esoteric, "spiritual".
Conversely, if women have tattoos--even if we got it 15 years ago before it was 'cool', we are labeled 'skanks.' The search for "tramp stamp" went on for more than 20+ pages on google.
Interesting.
I found more "Tramp Stamp" references as I perused:
"If they has as many stickin' out of them as they've had stuck in 'em, they'd look like porcupines."
"Ho-Tag search feature filters the skanks from the good girls, helping you search for what you REALLY want."
"Fairy Tram Stamps: Because Tinker Bell deserves a good facial too."
"Tramp Stamp Barbie: Ken's her bitch."
One poster on a forum said: "A 'spiritual' tramp stamp?
Please..."
This person assumes, as do most, that if a woman has a tattoo there, she is, quite literally, a tramp without the capacity for spirituality.
The causality of this isn't from the tattoos or even the name attached to them; the causality of this is the underlying sexism and contempt some American men have for women.
The problem, as I see it, is projection; these men have no clue what they want; they are conflicted, confused and downright lacking in the ability to be introspective enough to see that their grab-bag of mixed messages has women reeling.
Biologically, women want to be attractive to men. We have a drive to do this. Men, on the other hand, can't decide between a woman with a tramp stamp and a sweet Mother Mary figure to take home to momma. Since they mostly think with their dicks, they choose, ultimately, the "tramp", treat her like a tramp even though she may be a nice girl, and then after using her, project their own self-loathing onto her by calling her a 'skank'.
This of course doesn't apply to all men; only to the few loathsome creatures who deem themselves judge and jury on women's morality.
Recently on FaceBook, one of my contacts (I can't bring myself to call him 'friend') noted that "if you need to wear a condom while having sex, you shouldn't be sleeping with the girl in the first place."
I know....
WTF?!
Here is his logic:
One: either she is dirty, two: she is too poor to afford proper birth control, or three, she is into random, slutty hook-up's and who wants that?
I told him that, based on his criteria, he should avoid masturbation at all costs.
The irony in all of this is his main photo is him groping a very skankily dressed young blond girl. Yeah. I wonder if she sports a tramp stamp? I don't even wanna know.
The pervasive sense of contempt for obviously sexual women goes even further than that. I recently attended a party that my sister also attended. I was dressed in a sexy cat suit (it was Halloween) and she was dressed in a sexy costume as well. Apparently some of the men thought it appropriate to not only discuss 'sister love' (and not the benign kind), but to challenge our intellect based on our outerwear.
I'd humbly like to say that I'd be willing to take any of them on, anytime, anywhere. But I digress.
The underlying culprit in all of this anger toward us is, I believe, fear and self-loathing. These men fear us; these men can't wrap their heads around a woman who can make their junk tingle AND can beat them in a battle of wits, simultaneously. They feel small; hell, they probably
are small in many ways. Many MANY ways. Because of this, they feel the need to degrade and ostracize strong women who
own their sexuality because they know that, in a million years, they can never have them. No matter how drunk WE get, we still have taste.
Tramp stamp or no.
And it's funny--these little men seem to have the strongest opinions and the loudest voices. All the better to avoid them, my dear.
Then there are the Real Men.
Men who revel in their partner's or wives' intellect; who celebrate their partner's or wives' overwhelming sexuality...men who can hold their own in a conversation with an intelligent woman and not stoop to objectifying her to help their little ...EGO feel better.
These men relish their female compatriot's strength; they are not afraid to be Real Men--and the definition of that doesn't include degrading or patronizing women; rather, it includes honoring, accepting and embracing their differences and their humanity. Real men have power WITH their partners, not over--and aren't afraid to admit it. The Little Man derides Real Men as being sissys, pussy whipped, door mats. Talk about projection. They feel so small in their own small world that lashing out and puffing up seem to be the only way to show their "true" natures. Too bad it
actually shows their true natures: cowards with very small dicks.
Thank god I married a Real Man.
And he happens to like my tramp stamp.
Chowder